Comments on: Why Is Giorgio Armani Really Quitting Fur?

By: Truth About Fur

Truth About Fur — Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:07:14 +0000

In reply to Aurelius. Point taken. But in an ideal world, views are changed through reasoned debate, not pressure tactics. What is particularly irksome about cases like Armani is that animal rightists claim their targets have "seen the light" and changed of their own accord. It would at least be intellectually honest if they said such and such a company ditched fur because we forced them to.

By: Aurelius

Aurelius — Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:20:51 +0000

Does it really matter if Armani is not really heartfelt about giving up fur in his collection? Ok, so he’s responding to pressure brought about by the Animal Rightests. Good enough. And it shows their activism can be effective. Good for them. More power to them.

By: JOHN

JOHN — Sat, 02 Apr 2016 17:01:41 +0000

Kad – saying something intelligent might be more interesting than simply regurgitating pro-fur sentiments. At least it would give others something to actually talk about. I do, however, find it rather amusing that one of your only arguments is fuelled by money.. it says quite a lot about you. Rather than eating pro-fur propaganda, do some proper research and educate yourself.

By: KaD

KaD — Fri, 01 Apr 2016 22:43:59 +0000

I don’t know why everyone gives these vegan AR lunatics, who compromise a TINY portion of people and have no real money to spend, any credence. Especially when they can look up the facts for themselves and realize that animals are NOT ever skinned alive unless by AR activists and fur is NOT cruel.