My one criticism is that, if you’re trying to present what you’re saying as more truthful than that other guff, you’re better off forgoing euphemisms. Steadfast allies for the fur trade need to be people who can face the basic reality of a wild animal being killed, and the use of its body, and accept that. Without hiding the obvious behind words that pretend forests are fields and bears are vegetables.

A lot of animal rights rhetoric exploits urban ignorance, but the rest exploits guilt. IMO, not sounding ashamed is just as key as correcting facts.