<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fur Polls Often Farcical, But Not a Complete Waste of Time	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description>Truth About Fur Blog – Research, opinions and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-4248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4235&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

Let&#039;s be precise here. You said that &quot;hunters and trappers definitely leave abandoned pups, with pleasure.&quot; Of course, the &quot;with pleasure&quot; part is all you, with no factual basis. But the fact is that Truth About Fur represents the fur trade, and trappers who are doing it for fur do not trap when pups are still dependent on their mothers, period. There are a few reasons for this such as ethics and conservation, but the easiest one for you to grasp is perhaps economics. Furbearers&#039; pelts are prime in winter, while they bear their young in the spring when their pelts are far less lush and worth far less too. This is reflected in trapping seasons, which every state has. If you buy a parka trimmed with coyote fur, I can absolutely assure you that the coyote was trapped in winter. If a trapper were to try to sell the pelt of a coyote caught in spring or summer, the price he&#039;d get - if he even found a buyer - would not cover the price of his gas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4235">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be precise here. You said that &#8220;hunters and trappers definitely leave abandoned pups, with pleasure.&#8221; Of course, the &#8220;with pleasure&#8221; part is all you, with no factual basis. But the fact is that Truth About Fur represents the fur trade, and trappers who are doing it for fur do not trap when pups are still dependent on their mothers, period. There are a few reasons for this such as ethics and conservation, but the easiest one for you to grasp is perhaps economics. Furbearers&#8217; pelts are prime in winter, while they bear their young in the spring when their pelts are far less lush and worth far less too. This is reflected in trapping seasons, which every state has. If you buy a parka trimmed with coyote fur, I can absolutely assure you that the coyote was trapped in winter. If a trapper were to try to sell the pelt of a coyote caught in spring or summer, the price he&#8217;d get &#8211; if he even found a buyer &#8211; would not cover the price of his gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-4235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4221&quot;&gt;Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade&lt;/a&gt;.

Be fair! It was totally relevant. In reference to an argument about PETA, who said that pups are abandoned by trappers, this article reads &quot;trapping occurs in the fall and winter when fur is prime – in other words, at a time when the young of the year are already independent. Knowledgeable people may want to correct these (and other) urban legends&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4221">Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade</a>.</p>
<p>Be fair! It was totally relevant. In reference to an argument about PETA, who said that pups are abandoned by trappers, this article reads &#8220;trapping occurs in the fall and winter when fur is prime – in other words, at a time when the young of the year are already independent. Knowledgeable people may want to correct these (and other) urban legends&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-4221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4210&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

Last warning, Adam :) I&#039;m publishing this comment only because you get touchy when I ignore you. This comment of yours has absolutely NOTHING to do with our blog post. Keep your comments relevant or they will go straight in the trash.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4210">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>Last warning, Adam 🙂 I&#8217;m publishing this comment only because you get touchy when I ignore you. This comment of yours has absolutely NOTHING to do with our blog post. Keep your comments relevant or they will go straight in the trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-4210</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-4210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hunters and trappers take coyotes year round in some states, leaving abandoned pups, so the animal rights people were right about that, and you were wrong. Coyote hunting can be useful to landowners, but it can also be excessive, to say the least. I&#039;m not looking to argue the necessity of that here, however, hunters and trappers definitely leave abandoned pups, with pleasure. Only in recent years have wildlife managers begun to appreciate and understand the coyote&#039;s role in the environment, but the old school hunters have resisted the (often unofficial) newer guidelines and fair chase ethics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunters and trappers take coyotes year round in some states, leaving abandoned pups, so the animal rights people were right about that, and you were wrong. Coyote hunting can be useful to landowners, but it can also be excessive, to say the least. I&#8217;m not looking to argue the necessity of that here, however, hunters and trappers definitely leave abandoned pups, with pleasure. Only in recent years have wildlife managers begun to appreciate and understand the coyote&#8217;s role in the environment, but the old school hunters have resisted the (often unofficial) newer guidelines and fair chase ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lukas		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-2599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[btw here are some other places where to express some pro-fur statement :)
https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-people-wear-animal-fur and https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-animal-fur-be-used-for-clothes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw here are some other places where to express some pro-fur statement 🙂<br />
<a href="https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-people-wear-animal-fur" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-people-wear-animal-fur</a> and <a href="https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-animal-fur-be-used-for-clothes" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.debate.org/opinions/should-animal-fur-be-used-for-clothes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lukas		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-2598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe fur use will stay in fashion because the anti-fur campaign is fully based on nonsense and lies. Facts don’t seem important in today’s word, but I hope, we fur wearers aren’t so weak that we couldn’t ¨defend our rights. Fur is just one form how we use animals legitimely. So long as we eat meat, wear leather, down, wool etc and use animals for medical research, fur will have its place in fashion. Environmental benefits of fur trapping are unquestionable. Most people know real fur is much better than synthetics, but can’t proclaim it in the momental anti-fur atmosphere. The anti-fur attitude is today’s &quot;fashion&quot;, but it must change. The pro-fur activities, like yours, can contribute!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe fur use will stay in fashion because the anti-fur campaign is fully based on nonsense and lies. Facts don’t seem important in today’s word, but I hope, we fur wearers aren’t so weak that we couldn’t ¨defend our rights. Fur is just one form how we use animals legitimely. So long as we eat meat, wear leather, down, wool etc and use animals for medical research, fur will have its place in fashion. Environmental benefits of fur trapping are unquestionable. Most people know real fur is much better than synthetics, but can’t proclaim it in the momental anti-fur atmosphere. The anti-fur attitude is today’s &#8220;fashion&#8221;, but it must change. The pro-fur activities, like yours, can contribute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-2555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2554&quot;&gt;Robert O&#039;Brien&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s definitely a factor, Robert. Food always seems to trump clothing, and even though mink and fox farmers nowadays make full use of the carcass for oil, biofuel, fertliser, crab bait, etc., humans are just not keen on eating them. That said, there are a host of wild furbearers that make great eating. See here: https://truthaboutfur.com/top-5-tasty-furbearers-muskrat-stew/ And right after we finished this piece, a lot of folks wrote to say cats like mountain lion and lynx are especially tasty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2554">Robert O&#8217;Brien</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s definitely a factor, Robert. Food always seems to trump clothing, and even though mink and fox farmers nowadays make full use of the carcass for oil, biofuel, fertliser, crab bait, etc., humans are just not keen on eating them. That said, there are a host of wild furbearers that make great eating. See here: <a href="https://truthaboutfur.com/top-5-tasty-furbearers-muskrat-stew/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://truthaboutfur.com/top-5-tasty-furbearers-muskrat-stew/</a> And right after we finished this piece, a lot of folks wrote to say cats like mountain lion and lynx are especially tasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert O'Brien		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fur-polls-farcical-but-not-waste-of-time/#comment-2554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=13254#comment-2554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a fur fan, but I think over time fur will continue to come under attack.  For some reason, people equate meat and leather as &quot;necessity and by-product&quot; whereas, with fur, it is seen as ego and unnecessary.  Suffering animals.  Whereas meat, which involves killing animals, is seen as part of life and a choice.  So, I see leather as continuing to be acceptable as a fashion choice, whereas fur will increasingly be seen as an unnecessary and selfish choice.  Unless something productive is done with the carcasses of fur-bearing animals, I think fur will gradually be outlawed worldwide, sadly.  Pure emotion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fur fan, but I think over time fur will continue to come under attack.  For some reason, people equate meat and leather as &#8220;necessity and by-product&#8221; whereas, with fur, it is seen as ego and unnecessary.  Suffering animals.  Whereas meat, which involves killing animals, is seen as part of life and a choice.  So, I see leather as continuing to be acceptable as a fashion choice, whereas fur will increasingly be seen as an unnecessary and selfish choice.  Unless something productive is done with the carcasses of fur-bearing animals, I think fur will gradually be outlawed worldwide, sadly.  Pure emotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
