<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January Fur News: Fake Fur vs Real Fur	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/</link>
	<description>Truth About Fur Blog – Research, opinions and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/#comment-1561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth About Fur, voice of the North American fur trade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=8237#comment-1561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/#comment-1560&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt;.

That is the animal rights perspective, yes. One reason the real fur vs. fake fur argument may be confusing is that while the fur trade has long criticised fake fur for the environmental harm it causes, we are only partially responsible for the huge negative press fake fur is now receiving. The real momentum came from environmental scientists studying the harm caused by plastics in general, and in particular plastic bags. This has now become a major trend, and fake fur has been caught up in it. It&#039;s a huge boon for the fur trade, of course, but the real credit for this sea change can be pinned on opponents of plastic bags.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/#comment-1560">David</a>.</p>
<p>That is the animal rights perspective, yes. One reason the real fur vs. fake fur argument may be confusing is that while the fur trade has long criticised fake fur for the environmental harm it causes, we are only partially responsible for the huge negative press fake fur is now receiving. The real momentum came from environmental scientists studying the harm caused by plastics in general, and in particular plastic bags. This has now become a major trend, and fake fur has been caught up in it. It&#8217;s a huge boon for the fur trade, of course, but the real credit for this sea change can be pinned on opponents of plastic bags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://www.truthaboutfur.com/fake-fur-vs-real-fur/#comment-1560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthaboutfur.com/blog/?p=8237#comment-1560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the fight between Faux fur and real fur, it can get really confusing while watching both sides throw accusations and criticisms, this is why people sometimes forget what is the real aim of it: to stop the unnecessary fur farming. The thing is that no one strives to destroy traditions and skillcraft, it is the unethical business of the fur farms that is the main target of the movement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fight between Faux fur and real fur, it can get really confusing while watching both sides throw accusations and criticisms, this is why people sometimes forget what is the real aim of it: to stop the unnecessary fur farming. The thing is that no one strives to destroy traditions and skillcraft, it is the unethical business of the fur farms that is the main target of the movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
